COVID-19 UPDATE: We are open! Our team is working and offering consultations via phone, e-mail, and video conferencing.
Start With Your Free Consultation 612.444.5020

Recent Supreme Court Case May Erase Past DWI Offenses

A recent Supreme Court case called Missouri v. McNeely is having a significant effect on DWI laws in Minnesota. As a result, a lawyer at Caplan and Tamburino may be able to keep you from being convicted on your recent DWI or even get a DWI conviction from the past removed from your record. If you've had a recent or past DWI, please call us at 612-444-5020 and meet with a lawyer today to see if we can help you.

The new McNeely rule requires that each police officer must acquire a warrant before administering a breath, blood or urine test to discover someone's blood alcohol content during a DWI stop. If the officer who took your DWI test did not get a warrant, then we may be able to help you get your DWI thrown out of court or removed from your record.

In general, the courts do NOT allow new rules to be applied to cases that have had a final judgment.[1] However, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that a new rule for criminal prosecutions should be applied to all cases that are not yet final.[2] This means that if you still have the right to appeal your DWI conviction, you will likely be able to benefit from the new McNeely rule.

Also, if your case is final and you have exhausted all of your appeals then you may still be able to receive the benefit of the new rule if the Minnesota Supreme Court determines that the McNeely case fits into one of two exceptions.

The first exception is only at issue when the rule is considered to be "substantive".[3] The new McNeely rule, however, is not substantive. Therefore, this exception likely will not apply.

However, the second exception may apply to the new McNeely rule which would mean that we could obtain reversals on DWI convictions that are very old. And there are strong arguments for determining that the McNeely rule should be applied to old cases.


The question of whether McNeely applies retroactively will have to be answered by Minnesota's Supreme Court soon after their upcoming decision in State of Minnesota v. Brooks.[4] The court will apply the Teague analysis and will likely find that the McNeely rule does constitute a "new rule" under the Teague definition.[5] This means that the court should determine that the McNeely rule does apply to cases that are not final.

However, the court will also need to consider whether the McNeely rule applies to finalized cases. In general, a "new rule" is not applied to finalized cases unless it falls within one of the two exceptions.[6] Because the McNeely rule is procedural and not substantive, it cannot fulfill the first exception but justifiable arguments do exist to say that the McNeely rule fulfills the second exception. Therefore, the McNeely rule will likely be applied retroactively to cases that are not yet final and may also apply to cases that have already been finalized. Call our Minneapolis criminal defense lawyers 24/7 at 612-444-5020!

[1] Id.

[2] Chambers v. State, 831 N.W.2d 311, 323 (Minn. 2013); citing Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 300-10 (1989).

[3] Chambers at 326.

[4] State v. Brooks, A11-1042, 2012 WL 1570064 (Minn. Ct. App. May 7, 2012), review denied (July 17, 2012), cert. granted, judgment vacated, 133 S. Ct. 1996 (U.S. 2013); and State v. Brooks, A11-1043, 2012 WL 1914073 (Minn. Ct. App. May 29, 2012), review denied (July 17, 2012), cert. granted, judgment vacated, 133 S. Ct. 1996 (U.S. 2013)

[5] Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989).

[6] Id.


What Our Clients Are Saying

  • “ Today I had a court appearance where your attorney, LIS CARLSON represented me. I must start at the beginning, MS. CARLSON returned my phone call to her with in an hour of my first call to your office. I was overwhelmed with gratitude for the quick response to my call & most important how LIS immediately made me feel, she was professional, caring, her ability to immediately know that I was a total mess. Before she finished with my call she made sure that I was alright, her compassion for me was extremely needed. I immediately felt there couldn’t be a better attorney in the state better than LIS! Throughout this entire process, Lis was a pillar of strength. I was amazed at how she handled everything with extreme care & some very excellent, professional legal skills. I count my blessings but I count them twice when I came to LIS. The world needs more people like LIS, smart, intelligent, kind and caring.” - P.G.
  • “How do I ever thank you enough for your amazingly great strategy that got my case dismissed! ” - J. E.
  • “ Kayla Wengronowitz was my attorney in a claim against me involving Title IX and won my difficult and extensive case. She was a beacon of hope to me when my options seemed very limited. Kayla provided clarity for me to understand everything happening in the case, she made smart and calculated decisions, she made sure I was comfortable with every decision she made, and she responded to difficult situations seemingly with ease. Most importantly, Kayla was empathetic and provided comfort throughout the strenuous process. I am extremely grateful for her service and highly recommend her without reservation.” - Anonymous
  • “I strongly recommended to anybody who needs a criminal lawyer representation ” - M.M.
  • “ I just wanted to thank you so much! I am so pleased with all the hard work you put in. I would have never had the chance to get the outcome I did without you. You did an amazing job and we are feeling very greatful to have made the right call when we chose you.” - P.K.
View More Testimonials

Don't Wait To Request Your Free Consultation

We take calls at any time of the day or night, so please don’t wait to find out how we can assist you. During your first meeting, we'll evaluate your case and determine if we are the right fit for you.

  • Please enter your name.
  • This isn't a valid email address.
    Please enter your email.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
    Please enter your phone number.
    You entered an invalid number.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.