Start With Your Free Consultation 612.444.5020

Caplan & Tamburino Law Firm, PA

We have over a century of collective legal experience and have been practicing in state and federal courts across Minnesota since 1983.

Blood Tests for DWI in Minnesota

Challenging Chemical Test Evidence in a DWI Case

The Minnesota Court of Appeals determined that a search warrant is required before a blood test can be performed on a DWI suspect. It was once a crime to refuse a blood test, but the law now reflects that you cannot be penalized for not consenting to a blood test without a warrant. Although breath tests are typically favored over blood tests, this is a very big deal for DWI law.

Cases where warrants were not secured prior to a blood draw may be challenged, as the courts have now decided that this is an “unreasonable search and seizure” and a violation of a person’s constitutional rights. Any evidence obtained from an illegal blood test cannot be used in court, and could result in a dismissal of the case. Read more about this change to Minnesota law here.

Facing DWI charges in Minnesota? Contact our firm 24/7 for a free consultation!

Why Take a Test You Aren’t Legally Required to Take?

The debate over public safety and personal privacy when it comes to DWI testing is a complicated one, but one thing is now clear: those accused of DWI cannot be forced to submit to an invasive test simply because of an officer’s suspicion. Since people have a right not to incriminate themselves under the Fifth Amendment, it is unjust that they should be served punishment for refusing to confirm or deny a suspicion when they do not legally have to submit evidence against themselves.

Blood tests require the use of a needle, making them far more invasive than a breath test. The accuracy of blood tests is also questionable. If blood samples are not handled properly, they can become corrupted and produce inaccurate results. If you were arrested on suspicion of DWI after refusing an illegal blood test, we urge you to assert your right to legal representation and get in touch with a Minneapolis DWI lawyer at Caplan & Tamburino Law Firm, P.A. as soon as possible.

Speak with Our DWI Attorneys in Minneapolis!

The Fourth Amendment exists to protect people against unreasonable search and seizure, and the Minnesota Court of Appeals has agreed that invasive blood tests conducted without a search warrant violate this constitutional protection. If you have been penalized for refusing to take a blood test without a warrant, we may be able to challenge your case. Caplan & Tamburino Law Firm, P.A. has a successful history of DWI defense and have helped thousands of clients since 1983.

To schedule your free consultation with a Minneapolis DWI attorney, get in touch with a member of our team today at (612) 444-5020. We are available day and night to take your call!

Put Our Attorneys On Your Side

Our team has 100 years of collective experience. Our lawyers, Allan Caplan and Joe Tamburino, are frequently featured on local news networks, including radio and television appearances on Fox and WCCO radio. This has helped Caplan & Tamburino Law Firm, P.A. rise to prominence and gain a solid reputation of fighting vigorously not only for our clients, but also against the injustices they face when they have been charged with a crime or have been wrongfully injured.

Attorney Profiles

Recent Case Victories

  • Underage Consumption Case Resolved

    Defense: Evidence Suppressed Outcome: Client was charged with underage consumption after he submitted to Preliminary ...

  • Restraining Order Dismissed Client Won

    Case: Harassment Restraining Order Outcome: Our client, K.S. was accused of harassing his ex-girlfriend who petitioned ...

  • Conspiracy to Deliver 100,000 Tablets of Ecstacy No Executed Jail Time

    Outcome: Client was hired as a courier by a drug dealer in Canada to transport 100,000 tablets of Ecstacy to New York in ...

  • 1st & 3rd Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct investigation

    Defense: 1 st & 3 rd Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct investigation? Outcome: Client was accused of having sexual ...

  • Felony DWI Case Resolved

    Defense: Non prison disposition Outcome: Client was charged with his third Felony DWI in a period of ten years and his ...

  • Title IX (Sexual Misconduct) Case Dismissed

    Our client was notified by Gustavus College that he was being accused of sexual harassment by a student. Upon learning ...

  • Two counts of 5th Degree Assault against a child Not Guilty

    Outcome: Our client was charged with two counts of 5th-degree assault against a child. After a year of litigation and ...

  • Harassment Restraining Order

    Defense: Dismissal Outcome: Client, C.D., was served with a harassment restraining order by her ex-boyfriend’s new ...

  • Third Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) Reduction of Charges

    Outcome: Our client was charge with 3rd degree criminal sexual conduct, which called for a presumptive prison sentence ...

View More

Don't Wait To Request Your Free Consultation

We take calls at any time of the day or night, so please don’t wait to find out how we can assist you. During your first meeting, we'll evaluate your case and determine if we are the right fit for you.

  • Please enter your name.
  • This isn't a valid email address.
    Please enter your email.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
    Please enter your phone number.
    You entered an invalid number.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.